|
|
|
A
Brief History of the STW Program
The National Forum to Accelerate Middle-Grades Reform launched
its Schools to Watch program in 1999 to identify, recognize, and
learn from schools that were performing in an exemplary fashion
in each of the three core areas the Forum has identified as being
critical for a high performing middle-grades school—academic
excellence, developmental responsiveness, and social equity. Underpinning
these must be strong organizational and support structures.
The National Forum sought to identify the characteristics that
one would expect to find in a high-performing middle grades school,
and to develop specific criteria
that would capture what high-performing schools were “doing right,” and would also serve as
a guide to other schools looking to improve their own practice.
The Forum was aware that there are many schools across the country
that provide students a curriculum that stresses academic rigor
while also meeting the needs of young adolescents, and Schools
to Watch is now a vehicle for making these schools places that
others can learn from while recognizing and honoring them for meeting
the rigorous criteria. Schools that are Schools to Watch understand
that the highest level of achievement occurs when ALL students
are challenged with a rigorous curriculum in an environment that
supports their growth and development. In short, Schools to Watch
have something to teach other schools.
The National Forum developed 37 criteria in the key areas of academic
excellence, developmental responsiveness, social equity, and organizational
support, and began a pilot program to find the first “Schools
to Watch.” After a national search, four schools—one
in Kentucky, two in Illinois, and one in Texas—were identified
in 1999 and 2000. These schools were carefully documented and numerous
educators and policy-makers have visited them over the last four
years to learn how they deal with their many challenges and manage
to maintain a sustained trajectory of improvement. It is important
to note that the point of Schools to Watch is to infuse the criteria
into every day school practice, and to influence language and policy
about middle grades schools. Honoring Schools to Watch is an important,
but secondary, part of the program.
To infuse the criteria into schools and classrooms around the
country and to accelerate the overall rate of middle-grades reform,
the members of the National Forum recognized that the program needed
to be operating at the state level. A call for proposals went out
in the spring of 2002 and the Forum selected three states—California,
Georgia, and North Carolina—to be the first Schools to Watch
states. Each state had a long history of middle-grades reform,
and each state brought to the program an established partnership
of interested middle-grades stakeholders. These state-level leaders
included departments of education, middle school associations,
principal and curriculum leadership groups, and educators and administrators
from both the middle grades and university level. In 2003, the
state Schools to Watch collaboratives identified their first 10
Schools to Watch. These partnerships created at the state level
have been enormously powerful instruments of change, and have generated
many positive outcomes.
Following the successful roll-out of Schools to Watch in California,
Georgia, and North Carolina, the membership of the Forum decided
to bring more states into the fold. Colorado, Illinois, Kentucky,
and Virginia applied and became Schools to Watch states in 2003.
During the 2003-2004 school year, the seven states recognized 26
more schools as being “Schools to Watch”—bringing
the total to 40 nationwide.
The Schools to Watch program continues to grow and gather momentum.
The four national associations participating in the National Forum
and Schools to Watch—the National Association of Elementary
School Principals (NAESP), the National Association of Secondary
School Principals (NASSP), the National Middle School Association
(NMSA), and the National Staff Development Council (NSDC)—have
been instrumental in conceptualizing, promoting and supporting
the effort. Each has highlighted the program at national conferences
through pre-conference sessions, workshops, and school spotlights,
promoted Schools to Watch on the web and in publications, and shared
information through their networks. In addition, the four associations
have also encouraged state and regional affiliates to form partnerships
to strengthen the effort. These contributions have been extremely
beneficial.
Through public awareness created by the attendance of thousands
at Schools to Watch celebrations, through television, radio, and
newspaper coverage of recognized schools, and through attendance
at presentations made at state and national conferences, the program
has been generating a “buzz” in the community.
The program also continues to grow, with the Forum
selecting New York and Ohio in April of 2004 to join the effort,
bringing the total number of states to 9—almost 20% of the
nation.
The 40 Schools to Watch are all very different places. Some are
urban, others rural. Some have several thousand students, some
several hundred. Some are in high-wealth areas; others are in high-poverty
areas. Some are from very homogeneous communities; others have
great racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic diversity. Yet all of them
are meeting the challenges of middle grades education in ways that
foster a community where academic excellence, developmental responsiveness,
and social equity thrive. Educators from
neighboring districts—and from across the country—have
visited and learned from these schools. The National Forum strongly
encourages those interested to contact and visit these schools.
(See list of schools.) Each has important lessons to share with
others that will accelerate and enhance reform in middle-level
schools.
Schools to Watch
Home | Our Criteria | Visit
Our Schools | Links | Tell
a Friend |Talk to Us | National
Forum
|