|

|
The
schools have set benchmarks for implementing their strategies,
and they hold themselves accountable for specific results.
We cannot stress too much the importance of data in the lives
of these schools.
|
|
|
Contributions to support the work of the National Forum can now be made through Network for Good.
"Schools to Watch" is an initiative
launched by the National
Forum to Accelerate Middle-Grades Reform in 1999. The National
Forum is an alliance of more than 60 educators, researchers,
and
officers of national associations and foundations dedicated to
improving schools for young adolescents across the country.
Through
the Schools to Watch initiative, the National Forum identified four
schools across the United States that were well on their way to
meeting the Forum's criteria for high performance. Forum members
believe that three things are true of high-performing middle-grades
schools:
-
They are academically
excellent – these schools challenge all students to use
their minds well.
-
They are developmentally
responsive – these schools are sensitive to the unique developmental
challenges of early adolescence.
-
They are socially
equitable – these schools are democratic and fair, providing
every student with high-quality teachers, resources, and supports.
To achieve this level of performance, high-performing
schools establish norms, structures,
and organizational arrangements to support and sustain their
trajectory toward excellence. They have a sense of purpose that
drives every facet of practice and decision-making.
Selecting schools to watch through our state program.
Since 2002 all schools to watch are identified through the growing state program.
States appy to be recognized as a state STW, receive technical assistance to establish
the state program and conduct the identification process.
Each state program serves as a beacon to guide contemporary school improvement and middle-grades
educational policy.
Selecting Schools to Watch
To find these schools, the National Forum polled
its members for nominations. Members nominated 64 schools who were
then invited to submit written applications. The Forum then requested
additional quantitative and qualitative data, concentrating particularly
on academic excellence, developmental responsiveness, and social
equity.
Twenty-eight
schools applied, and Forum members selected nine of these for one-day
site visits in the spring and fall of 1999. Of this smaller group,
the Forum selected four schools for return three-day visits in the
fall of 1999 and the spring of 2000. At least three site visitors
were assigned to each school for the second visit. During this visit,
extensive data was collected, and dozens of interviews were conducted
with students, teachers, parents, administrators, business partners,
and the principal. Classroom observations were conducted, and Forum
site visitors sat in on team meetings and socialized with students
in the lunchroom. The school tours on this
site are based on the data gathered during those visits, and as
such, the information presented in them is valid as of the dates
during which the visits were made.
The Forum selected Barren County Middle School
in Glasgow, Kentucky and Jefferson Middle School in Champaign,
Illinois in May 1999. During the second and final selection round
in December 1999, the Forum selected Freeport Intermediate School
in Freeport, Texas and Thurgood Marshall Middle School in
Chicago, Illinois.
Common Threads
While each school faces different challenges related
to its location, student demographics, levels of district support,
and other factors, the Forum's site visitors observed some common
themes across all four schools:
-
The schools know and articulate the academic
outcomes they seek. In some cases, the outcomes are prescribed
by the state or district; in others the faculty have adopted
the outcomes recommended by their various disciplines.
-
The schools are taking deliberate steps to help
students achieve those outcomes by making strategic changes
in curriculum, teaching, and school services.
-
The schools have set benchmarks for implementing
their strategies, and hold themselves accountable for specific
results. We cannot stress too much the importance of data in
the lives of these schools.
-
Each school strategically concentrates its
energies on important focus areas. As a result, the changes
in each school are burrowing deeply into its culture.
-
The schools have strong, visionary leaders
who can articulate challenging goals, and motivate faculty and
staff to reach those goals.
School Snapshots
This site includes snapshots of each of the schools
– examples and stories from one moment in time that create a picture
of what a high-performing school looks like. There has been no attempt
to be exhaustive. The Forum has chosen each school’s most powerful
lessons, and expects visitors to this site to question why a particular
anecdote or analysis is used to illuminate one criterion rather
than another. In these extremely coherent schools, there is rich
overlap.
We invite you to take a leisurely
“tour” of the four schools, have a virtual meeting with each
principal, and take a careful look at how each school has grappled
with the National Forum's criteria for high performance.
Schools to
Watch Home | Our Criteria
| Visit Our Schools | Links
| Tell a Friend | Talk
to Us | National Forum
|